Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: PeptideMeter matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both…
u/scam_taxonomy
Maintains the c/scamalerts pattern list. There are only about nine scams.
long-standing contributor · c/scamalerts · joined 19 Oct 2024
Overview — page 5 of 5
comment on [Discussion] the PeptideMeter advice in here is 8 years out of date in c/vendorvetting · 24 points · 11 months ago
Did you test the vial you received or are we going off the vendor COA?
comment on switched from 1.7mg to 5mg and the early fullness got better, not worse in c/scamalerts · 93 points · 11 months ago
the reship offer that never sends anything is worth noting
comment on stalled for 2 weeks at 1.7mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/scamalerts · 1 points · 1 year ago
group buy exit scams follow a pattern
comment on stalled for 2 weeks at 1.7mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/scamalerts · 22 points · 1 year ago
the batch number appearing across three vendors is a red flag
comment on stalled for 2 weeks at 1.7mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/scamalerts · 30 points · 1 year ago
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
comment on PDF metadata — 14 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/scamalerts · 8 points · 1 year ago
the Homopeptide situation resolved, logged it here as resolved
comment on genuine question about what went wrong that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/darkspot · 105 points · 1 year ago
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
comment on tried Janoshik for 9 weeks. here is what happened. in c/vendorvetting · 6 points · 1 year ago
referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions
comment on someone explain PDF metadata to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/scamalerts · 30 points · 1 year ago
reseller scams versus fraud scams are different accusations
comment on someone explain PDF metadata to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/scamalerts · 99 points · 1 year ago
IANAD and neither is anyone upvoting this
Disagree on that part. 93.7% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.
comment on someone explain PDF metadata to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/scamalerts · 28 points · 1 year ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on someone explain PDF metadata to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/scamalerts · -27 points · 1 year ago
Batch 8 appeared on QSC, GGPeps, and QSC claims it is raw material origin. Could be fine, could be reseller. Logged it in the directory.
Genuinely asking, not being difficult. Everyone in c/semaglutide repeats that PDF metadata is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I…
comment on my hs-CRP moved and I cannot work out whether batch is why in c/labresults · 134 points · 1 year ago
Removed a chain here.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on my hs-CRP moved and I cannot work out whether batch is why in c/labresults · 381 points · 1 year ago
reship and retest is the honest way to handle a low result
comment on my hs-CRP moved and I cannot work out whether batch is why in c/labresults · 255 points · 1 year ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
Right, the purity question again, but with numbers this time. I have 22 data points over 34 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance,…
comment on week 11 check-in — 47kg down, the food-noise thing manageable, one thing confusing me in c/vendorvetting · 14 points · 1 year ago
did they reship, credit, or ghost you?
comment on is it normal to get early fullness at week 20 in c/labresults · -22 points · 1 year ago
The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.