u/valeria_girard
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Mysuru.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
Comments — page 3 of 3
comment on the COA question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/coa · 22 points · 1 year ago
purity and net content are two different numbers, same vial
comment on Janoshik is the most under-discussed thing in c/sideeffects in c/labresults · 137 points · 1 year ago
Crossposting this to c/coa because the people who need it are not reading this community.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring certificate of analysis at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/coa · 11 points · 1 year ago
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.
comment on [Discussion] the purity advice in here is 8 years out of date in c/labresults · 14 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. Below-spec results matter as much as good ones.
comment on [Question] Australia — has anyone got a straight answer on purity in c/coa · 1 points · 1 year ago
post the whole document, not the headline number
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #3 — Germany, 3 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/glp1aus · 27 points · 1 year ago
New Zealand is different on the two sides
comment on Spain: batch, and what it actually costs here in c/coa · 14 points · 1 year ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on tried interval stretching for 15 weeks. here is what happened. in c/tapering · 62 points · 1 year ago
the regain is treatment of chronic condition ending, not failure
comment on TGA — 21 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/glp1aus · 35 points · 1 year ago
no naming compounders operating against current rules
comment on related substances — my 21-week log, condensed into one table in c/coa · 1.2k points · 1 year ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
Adding to this: purity is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on Australia — my 7-week log, condensed into one table in c/glp1aus · 16 points · 2 years ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
comment on switched from 7.5mg to 15mg and the the food-noise thing got better, not worse in c/labresults · 66 points · 2 years ago
Is that 95.1% area or mass?
comment on switched from 7.5mg to 15mg and the the food-noise thing got better, not worse in c/labresults · 116 points · 2 years ago
MKM product, Medutest test, 98.1% result, batch 18, 15 days in transit. Logged.
comment on the batch question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/coa · 48 points · 2 years ago
Yeah, 96.8% area is not the problem, the missing impurity breakdown is the problem.