[Question] how do you actually verify rodent data
Confession thread, sort of.
I went from 5mg to 1.7mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 19 weeks later, at which point I had no way of knowing whether the dose increase did anything or whether it would have broken anyway.
So now I have muscle cramps I did not need and a data point I cannot interpret. Two lessons in one.
Posting it in the hope that somebody at week 18 reads it before doing the same thing.
best — the order this archive was captured in
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
This is correct. The naming is genuinely confusing.
regulatory status changed in 8 countries, check yours
Yeah, rodent data does not scale to humans.
Stalled for 11 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 86.
pentadecapeptide is tendon, the supply chain naming is a mess
research use only, no human protocols, no injection instructions
handlers in the community are rare and cautious
Strongly agree. Zero human controlled data.
the sequence literature looks promising but rodent-only
Yeah, rodent data does not scale to humans.
Disagree on that part. 98.7% and 98.9% on the same vial is normal.
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
Yeah, rodent data does not scale to humans.
Did anything else change in the same window?
near-zero controlled human data, full stop
- 1Yeah, rodent data does not scale to humans.9 comments in this branch · started by u/cormac_roos
- 2Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.4 comments in this branch · started by u/clara_danquah