[Caution] research use only. handling questions welcome, protocols are not.
Right, the pentadecapeptide question again, but with numbers this time.
I have 24 data points over 20 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.
The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 17, not week 66. People give up long before the interesting part.
Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.
best — the order this archive was captured in
rodent data must be labelled as rodent data
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
What was the batch number and which service?
handlers in the community are rare and cautious
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
I am going to push back on this slightly.
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.
Week 66 for me and the honest summary is: 29kg down, sulphur burps manageable, and I have thought about food maybe four times today.
the rodent data rodent evidence is solid, human evidence is not
handlers in the community are rare and cautious
Strongly agree. Zero human controlled data.
I am going to push back on this slightly.
- 1Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On…5 comments in this branch · started by u/nils_ferreira
- 2rodent data must be labelled as rodent data4 comments in this branch · started by u/elin_varga