[Meta] the sequence rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining
Genuinely asking, not being difficult. Everyone in c/scamalerts repeats that regulatory is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 8 threads of people agreeing with each other. Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is true because…
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
Removed a chain here.
Disagree on that part. 98.9% and 99.0% on the same vial is normal.
Came off after 2 weeks for financial reasons. Regained about a third over the following year. Back on now at a much lower dose.
the regulatory rodent evidence is solid, human evidence is not
Yeah, rodent data does not scale to humans.
handlers in the community are rare and cautious
What was the batch number and which service?
sequence and naming claims need the actual sequence