GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of rodent data: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 — 41 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.6k
c/bpc157·submitted 1 year ago by u/hugo_bergstrom

rodent data: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1

Scepticbranch of 5 comments

Right, the pentadecapeptide question again, but with numbers this time. I have 22 data points over 18 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign. The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am…

Read the full submission and all 41 comments →

This branch

5 comments, started 1 year ago
u/cormac_roos186 points·1 year ago·edited

Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.

replysharereportpermalink
u/neha_rahimi-21 points·1 year ago

pentadecapeptide is tendon, the supply chain naming is a mess

replysharereportpermalink
u/nils_ferreira1 point·1 year ago

pentadecapeptide is sequence, the supply chain naming is a mess

replysharereportpermalink
u/enzo_fonseca121 points·1 year ago

Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all.

Adding to this: regulatory is doing more work than the comment implies.

replysharereportpermalink
u/vikram_mbeki56 points·1 year ago

the sequence literature looks promising but rodent-only

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/bpc157

BPC-157 as it actually is: a pentadecapeptide with a genuinely interesting rodent tendon-and-gut literature, near-zero controlled human data, a naming and sequence mess in the supply chain, and a regulatory status that changed sharply in several countries.

35kmembers
62submissions
Mar 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/bpc157 rules
  1. Research use only. No human protocols, no injection instructions.
  2. Rodent data must be labelled as rodent data in the body.
  3. Sequence and naming claims need the actual sequence.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.