[PSA] escrow is not what most of this community thinks it is
Something I noticed reading old threads that I have not seen said out loud.
The advice on network in this community changed substantially around the start of last year, and nobody went back and updated the older posts. So depending on which thread the search engine hands you, you get two contradictory answers with the same confidence.
I have listed what I think the current consensus is below. Correct me — that is the point of posting it.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
escrow for group buys is standard, use it
never post a wallet address, not yours, not a vendor's
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
network selection matters, wrong chain is the expensive typo
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
the 4% discount versus 39% network fees
escrow for group buys is standard, use it
Stablecoin or other?
[removed by moderator]
confirmations are gas fees, the exchange rate at 8 blocks is the deal
no price talk, no tickers, no investment discussion
Slight fix: the number was 99.1, not 98.4. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
Sent orfo payment to the wrong chain. Germany, wrong network, vendor could not credit it. 5 day lesson.
Which network and did the vendor confirm they credit it?
- 1Stablecoin or other?7 comments in this branch · started by u/stablecoin_steve
- 2Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.6 comments in this branch · started by u/chain_confirm_c