GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Question] the UK — has anyone got a straight answer on chargeback — 24 comments in the full submission. View in context.
196
c/cryptopay·submitted 6 months ago by u/reverse_image_ron

[Question] the UK — has anyone got a straight answer on chargeback

Questionbranch of 10 comments

Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom. I have been tracking escrow against eGFR for 23 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here. Caveats up front: one person, one lab, one assay,…

Read the full submission and all 24 comments →

This branch

10 comments, started 6 months ago
u/jonas_eriksen19 points·6 months ago

no price talk, no tickers, no investment discussion

replysharereportpermalink
u/chain_confirm_cMOD9 points·6 months ago

This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.

replysharereportpermalink
u/reverse_image_ronOP5 points·6 months ago

confirmations are gas fees, the exchange rate at 2 blocks is the deal

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]4 points·6 months ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/isabela_guerrero2 points·6 months ago

confirmations are gas fees, the exchange rate at 2 blocks is the deal

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 22 weeks to accept.

replysharereportpermalink
u/bastian_ekstrom15 points·6 months ago

network selection matters, wrong chain is the expensive typo

replysharereportpermalink
u/hassan_nilsen7 points·6 months ago

Did you check confirmation speed on that chain?

replysharereportpermalink
u/nils_ferreira15 points·6 months ago

This is correct. Gas fees are real costs.

replysharereportpermalink
u/anders_vermeulen4 points·6 months ago

I am going to push back on this slightly.

replysharereportpermalink
u/search_before_post10 points·6 months ago

no price talk, no tickers, no investment discussion

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/cryptopay

Paying for research material with crypto: which networks vendors actually credit, confirmation windows, memo/tag requirements, gas versus discount arithmetic, escrow for group buys, and the total absence of chargeback rights. Not investment discussion — payments only.

25kmembers
95submissions
Jan 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/cryptopay rules
  1. No price talk, no tickers, no investment discussion. Payments only.
  2. Never post a wallet address. Not yours, not a vendor's.
  3. No group-buy recruitment. Discussing how they fail is fine.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.