jurisdiction: what the trials say vs what this community says
Confession thread, sort of.
I went from 15mg to 7.5mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 19 weeks later, at which point I had no way of knowing whether the dose increase did anything or whether it would have broken anyway.
So now I have muscle cramps I did not need and a data point I cannot interpret. Two lessons in one.
Posting it in the hope that somebody at week 13 reads it before doing the same thing.
best — the order this archive was captured in
no advice on evading inspection or misdeclaring
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
no advice on evading inspection or misdeclaring
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 45 weeks to accept.
I am going to push back on this slightly.
seizure letters: redact everything identifying
seizure letters: redact everything identifying
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 33 weeks to accept.
I am going to push back on this slightly.
the Canada import rules are specific to Canada
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
Strongly agree. Jurisdiction matters.
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
import countries have different thresholds
the 24mg import allowance is Denmark-specific
no advice on evading inspection or misdeclaring
customs holds vary by season
Yeah, Germany rules are not global.
personal-import allowances differ by country
Stalled for 5 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 76.
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
What was in the seizure letter?
- 1Strongly agree. Jurisdiction matters.11 comments in this branch · started by u/lane_watcher
- 2I am going to push back on this slightly.6 comments in this branch · started by u/erez_yilmaz