2 months in and jurisdiction is still the thing I get wrong
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.
The claim: seizure matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 19 months without either producing anything.
What would actually settle it is 23 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.
If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Week 11 for me and the honest summary is: 36kg down, sulphur burps manageable, and I have thought about food maybe four times today.
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
the Denmark import rules are specific to Denmark
Maintenance for 20 months now. Weight moves within about 3kg and the dose is a quarter of what it peaked at.
research-use documentation is not a magic word
Not to be pedantic but import and personal import are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
Stalled for 16 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 9.
- 1the Denmark import rules are specific to Denmark5 comments in this branch · started by u/week_two_confused_2026