unpopular opinion: pharmacy is massively overrated
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.
The claim: EMA matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 14 months without either producing anything.
What would actually settle it is 39 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.
If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.
best — the order this archive was captured in
reimbursement reality differs sharply
[deleted]
[deleted]
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
EU rules is usually a national question wearing a hat
pricing posts need date and currency
pharmacy stock varies by country and season
the 9-country variation is the whole point
the 9-country variation is the whole point
Disagree on that part. 98.7% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
tag your country in the title, bare EU gets a template
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
the Spain answer is not the Spain answer
The thing nobody prepared me for was the quiet. Not the appetite, the quiet. The constant negotiation in my head about food just stopped.
- 1Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.7 comments in this branch · started by u/eu_apotheke_a
- 2reimbursement reality differs sharply6 comments in this branch · started by u/ahmed_fonseca