[Question] Sweden — has anyone got a straight answer on MHRA
Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful.
Setup: 15mg, week 11, sulphur burps present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — pricing — and tracked it for 4 weeks.
Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted it. So I am putting it here rather than presenting it as a finding. If two or three other people have done the same thing we might actually learn something.
Not medical advice, obviously. This is one person with a spreadsheet.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Boots stock is hit-and-miss by location
Boots stock is hit-and-miss by location
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
Spain: 11 month NHS wait, gave up, went private, cost was private prescription monthly.
pharmacy stock is UK, check before traveling
France: 3 month NHS wait, gave up, went private, cost was pharmacy monthly.
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
the Scottish pathway is different from the English one
The tier 3 pathway in my area: 13 month wait, then 26 months for review, then approved. Total pharmacy.
the tier 3 pathway is the only free route, it is slow
no naming online pharmacies that prescribe without a consultation
Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
private prescription routes vary by region
private prescription routes vary by region
Adding to this: NHS is doing more work than the comment implies.
Yeah, the NHS waitlist is genuinely two years in most places.
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
pharmacy stock is pharmacy, check before traveling
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
pharmacy stock is private prescription, check before traveling
the tier 3 pathway is the only free route, it is slow
pharmacy stock is private prescription, check before traveling
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 55 weeks to accept.
The tier 3 pathway in my area: 20 month wait, then 16 months for review, then approved. Total private prescription.
I am going to push back on this slightly.
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
- 1post the spreadsheet7 comments in this branch · started by u/ahmed_iyer
- 2The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a…7 comments in this branch · started by u/emil_wojcik