[Question] how do you verify identity when there is no reference standard
Been lurking in c/cagrilintide for about 2 months and finally have something worth posting.
Short version: week 61, 2.4mg, and secretagogue is the bit I still cannot get a straight answer on. I have read the wiki, I have read the last 7 threads, and the answers split roughly down the middle.
What I actually want to know is whether the people saying it does not matter have measured it, or whether it is just repeated confidently. Happy to be told I am overthinking this — I probably am — but I would rather overthink it now than at week 55.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Strongly agree. Evidence level matters.
evidence-level statements required: in vitro, rodent, or human
name the compound precisely, TB-500 and Thymosin Beta-4 are not the same
name the compound precisely, TB-500 and Thymosin Beta-4 are not the same
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
research use only, handling and analysis, not administration
the 18-letter analogs are speculative
evidence-level statements required: in vitro, rodent, or human
This is correct. Name it precisely.
evidence-level statements required: in vitro, rodent, or human
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
the research peptides literature is thin on humans
Maintenance for 13 months now. Weight moves within about 3kg and the dose is a quarter of what it peaked at.
the 6-letter analogs are speculative
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
not approved for human use, full stop
Strongly agree. Evidence level matters.
Genuine question — what concentration were you at?
- 1evidence-level statements required: in vitro, rodent, or human10 comments in this branch · started by u/rania_salinas