u/coring_the_stopper
Same entry point every time = rubber cores into your vial. Rotate the puncture site.
member · joined 14 Jun 2024
Overview — page 5 of 5
comment on [Lab] 7th independent test on BCH, and the trend is the interesting part in c/labresults · -27 points · 1 year ago
below-spec results get logged, not dismissed
comment on [Results] 72 weeks, 11kg, and A1c was the hard part in c/bloodwork · 24 points · 1 year ago
the 9 month ALT check is the routine
Disagree on that part. 98.4% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
comment on batch: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/labresults · 10 points · 1 year ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on switched from 1.0mg to 0.5mg and the constipation got better, not worse in c/labresults · 44 points · 1 year ago
do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body
comment on reflux — my 12-week log, condensed into one table in c/sideeffects · 8 points · 1 year ago
Are you on a pen or research vial? The formulation changes the profile.
comment on help me understand private prescription, I have read the wiki twice in c/glp1uk · 17 points · 1 year ago
MHRA supply notices change monthly, follow the actual list
comment on reflux — my 12-week log, condensed into one table in c/sideeffects · 552 points · 1 year ago
Same experience. Week 84 and it simply stopped. I know that is not useful information but it is what happened.
comment on is it normal to get sulphur burps at week 90 in c/glp1eu · 1 points · 1 year ago
pricing posts need date and currency
comment on stalled for 4 weeks at 2.4mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/sideeffects · 74 points · 1 year ago
resting heart rate moved up 6 bpm and settled back down when I stopped escalating
comment on three years of declared value threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/customs · 16 points · 1 year ago
always state your country, advice from another jurisdiction can harm you
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify external review in c/insurancefights · 2 points · 1 year ago
This is correct.
Adding to this: formulary is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for formulary posts in c/insurancefights · 42 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. Appeal letters work.
comment on [PSA] test results is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/labresults · 241 points · 1 year ago
Batch number? Date of test?
comment on my hs-CRP moved and I cannot work out whether seizure is why in c/customs · 58 points · 1 year ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about appeal in c/insurancefights · 24 points · 1 year ago
Which state? Coverage varies.
comment on [Vendor] QST order #20 — Denmark, 39 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/tirzepatide · 299 points · 1 year ago
the appetite change on tirz is more than just reduced hunger, it is different machinery
comment on am I the only one who found formulary harder than the injections in c/insurancefights · 6 points · 1 year ago
resubmission after denial requires new documentation
comment on [Discussion] the Janoshik advice in here is 20 years out of date in c/labresults · 8 points · 1 year ago
Slight fix: the number was 97.4, not 97.2. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on what changed for me between week 95 and week 49 in c/labresults · 34 points · 1 year ago
the vial you ordered versus the vial you received might be different batches
comment on Janoshik is the most under-discussed thing in c/sideeffects in c/labresults · 12 points · 1 year ago
Not to be pedantic but test results and Medutest are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.