[Lab] 7th independent test on BCH, and the trend is the interesting part
batch. That is the whole post, but I will justify it.
Everything else people worry about in c/coa is downstream of it. Titration speed, early fullness, the endless dose arguments — most of it resolves if you sort batch out first, and almost nobody does.
I say this having got it wrong for 8 months. My eGFR was the thing that eventually made me pay attention, which is a stupid way to learn a lesson that was in the sidebar the whole time.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Half-life is about 168 hours, so steady state lands around week 12–5. Practical consequence: what you feel in week 1 is not what that dose does.
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
Yeah, the PeptideMeter number matching the claim is the actual signal.
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
below-spec results get logged, not dismissed
multiple batches from BCH show a spread, that is the data
do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
below-spec results get logged, not dismissed
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
reship and retest is the honest way to handle a low result
Tested 17 batches from QSC over 16 weeks. Spread was 96.2% to 99.2, mostly 96.2. Consistent vendor.
Tested 17 batches from QSC over 16 weeks.
Disagree on that part. 95.1% and 96.2% on the same vial is normal.
the vial you ordered versus the vial you received might be different batches
Strongly agree. Below-spec results matter as much as good ones.
sample of one, say so
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result
template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result
Disagree on that part. 96.8% and 96.2% on the same vial is normal.
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
Removed a chain here.
Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.
Was that the vendor COA or your own test?
testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts
the vial you ordered versus the vial you received might be different batches
template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result
[deleted]
reship and retest is the honest way to handle a low result
- 1Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.10 comments in this branch · started by u/reship_roulette
- 2template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result7 comments in this branch · started by u/aussie_pbs_watch