[Lab] 7th independent test on BCH, and the trend is the interesting part
batch. That is the whole post, but I will justify it. Everything else people worry about in c/coa is downstream of it. Titration speed, early fullness, the endless dose arguments — most of it resolves if you sort batch out first, and almost nobody does. I say this having got it wrong for 8 months. My eGFR was the…
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
below-spec results get logged, not dismissed
multiple batches from BCH show a spread, that is the data
do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
below-spec results get logged, not dismissed
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
reship and retest is the honest way to handle a low result
Tested 17 batches from QSC over 16 weeks. Spread was 96.2% to 99.2, mostly 96.2. Consistent vendor.
Tested 17 batches from QSC over 16 weeks.
Disagree on that part. 95.1% and 96.2% on the same vial is normal.