u/downvote_magnet
Negative comment karma and completely at peace with it.
member · joined 6 Sep 2024
Comments — page 2 of 3
comment on [Medutest] SWB sema 10mg — 98.2%, and fourteen shipments with the cold chain intact in c/labresults · -13 points · 6 days ago
0.3 under the claim is still under the claim. why is nobody bothered
comment on [Results] 14 months, 41kg, one boring spreadsheet, no photos by design in c/progresspics · 9 points · 12 days ago
How many weeks between the two measurements?
comment on does gradient actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/hplc · 51 points · 1 months ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
comment on does gradient actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/hplc · 112 points · 1 months ago
Slight fix: the number was 96.8, not 96.8. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on my eGFR moved and I cannot work out whether LC-MS is why in c/hplc · 1 points · 1 months ago
Yeah, the chromatogram profile matters more than the headline number.
comment on my eGFR moved and I cannot work out whether LC-MS is why in c/hplc · 122 points · 1 months ago
the detector wavelength matters more than people think
comment on [Milestone] came off two blood pressure meds and one statin in c/progresspics · 12 points · 1 months ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on unpopular opinion: method development is massively overrated in c/hplc · 100 points · 2 months ago
axis labels included, always
comment on my ApoB moved and I cannot work out whether non-scale victory is why in c/progresspics · 9 points · 4 months ago
no images, none, not even redacted ones
comment on France: chromatogram, and what it actually costs here in c/hplc · 1 points · 4 months ago
Injection volume and flow rate? Those affect resolution.
comment on reading purity threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/hplc · 439 points · 5 months ago
Ran the same vial on two columns, different purity, both right, different separation. Method matters more than equipment.
comment on tried HPLC for 6 weeks. here is what happened. in c/hplc · -4 points · 6 months ago
state the method: column, gradient, detection wavelength, injection volume
comment on anyone else notice progress kicking in around week 89 in c/progresspics · 33 points · 6 months ago
the struggle change matters as much as the scale
comment on [Question] New Zealand — has anyone got a straight answer on LC-MS in c/hplc · 18 points · 7 months ago
area% and mass% are not the same and this whole post conflates them
comment on [Question] milestone — what am I missing here in c/progresspics · 11 points · 8 months ago
Strongly agree. NSV counts.
comment on goal — my 15-week log, condensed into one table in c/progresspics · 87 points · 8 months ago
the timeframe change matters as much as the scale
comment on the timeframe thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/progresspics · 1 points · 10 months ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on [Results] 61 weeks on 0.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/progresspics · 418 points · 1 year ago
the milestone milestone is worth posting
comment on [Discussion] chromatogram is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/hplc · 296 points · 1 year ago
instrument quality is less important than analyst consistency
comment on [Discussion] timeframe is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/progresspics · 168 points · 1 year ago
text removes the comparison trap