GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
3.1k
c/progresspics·posted 8 months ago by u/andres_restrepo

goal — my 15-week log, condensed into one table

Results Clean Column ×7 Slow Clap ×3 Long Haul ×3

Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom.

I have been tracking progress against triglycerides for 15 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here.

Caveats up front: one person, one lab, one assay, no control, and I changed my training in the middle of it, which was stupid.

tl;dr: probably real, definitely smaller than the threads imply, and not worth reorganising your week around.

4,927 up / 1,868 down73% upvoted33 commentsid lrl0l02 Nov 2025

33 comments

30 in this archive, depth 5

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/units_not_mgsyringe math695 points·8 months ago

Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.

replysharereportpermalink
u/andres_restrepoOP311 points·8 months ago

the goal change matters as much as the scale

replysharereportpermalink
u/andres_restrepoOP503 points·8 months ago

the community is deliberately image-free

replysharereportpermalink
u/wholesome_lurker397 points·8 months ago·edited

Strongly agree. NSV counts.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kian_ferreira325 points·8 months ago

starting point, current point, timeframe, dose history

replysharereportpermalink
u/patient_labslip_log168 points·8 months ago

the community is deliberately image-free

Disagree on that part. 94.2% and 95.1% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/sigrid_kaufmann411 points·8 months ago

text removes the comparison trap

replysharereportpermalink
u/gentle_correctionMOD337 points·8 months ago

Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kaplan_meier_kim149 points·8 months ago·edited

include timeframe and starting point or it is a brag with no info

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]111 points·8 months ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/rosa_almeida162 points·8 months ago

no images, none, not even redacted ones

replysharereportpermalink
u/zaid_grimaldi232 points·8 months ago

This is correct. Process matters more than the number.

replysharereportpermalink
u/india_generic_g141 points·8 months ago·edited

non-scale victories count, post them

replysharereportpermalink
u/honest_syringe33-30 points·8 months ago

no commenting on anybody's body, comment on the process

replysharereportpermalink
u/due_diligence_dee68 points·8 months ago

Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rasmus_mensah163 points·8 months ago

You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.

replysharereportpermalink
u/downvote_magnet87 points·8 months ago

the timeframe change matters as much as the scale

replysharereportpermalink
u/kavya_radich68 points·8 months ago

That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.

replysharereportpermalink
u/injection_site_iris37 points·8 months ago

text only is the whole point of the community

replysharereportpermalink
u/slow_logbook_ftw13 points·8 months ago

Strongly agree. NSV counts.

replysharereportpermalink
u/came_for_the_coa12 points·8 months ago

non-scale victories count, post them

replysharereportpermalink
u/thyroid_tangent146 points·8 months ago

Strongly agree. NSV counts.

replysharereportpermalink
u/greta_perrin101 points·8 months ago

Did anything else change in the same window?

replysharereportpermalink
u/runa_grimaldi50 points·8 months ago

Strongly agree. NSV counts.

replysharereportpermalink
u/vial_math_verasyringe math27 points·8 months ago

text removes the body-shaming pile-on

replysharereportpermalink
u/patient_labslip_log13 points·8 months ago

text removes the body-shaming pile-on

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 37 weeks to accept.

replysharereportpermalink
u/gustav_cardoso61 points·8 months ago

This is correct. Process matters more than the number.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kaia_wojcik70 points·8 months ago

include timeframe and starting point or it is a brag with no info

replysharereportpermalink
u/niels_roos89 points·8 months ago

What was the batch number and which service?

replysharereportpermalink
u/gentle_correctionnice about it26 points·8 months ago

no commenting on anybody's body, comment on the process

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/progresspics

Progress posts with no images, by design. Starting point, current point, timeframe, dose history, what changed besides the scale. Text-only removes the comparison trap, the body-shaming pile-on and the entire question of who owns a photo of your torso.

51kmembers
62submissions
May 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/progresspics rules
  1. No images. None. Not even redacted ones. This is the whole point of the community.
  2. Include timeframe and starting point or it reads as a brag with no information.
  3. No commenting on anybody's body. Comment on the process.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.