348
[Sceptic] the tendon claims outran the evidence by about a decade
Genuinely asking, not being difficult. Everyone in c/scamalerts repeats that regulatory is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I…
u/rosa_almeida
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Essen.
member · joined 13 Apr 2025
906post karma
3,725comment karma
2submissions
61comments
comment on [Sceptic] the tendon claims outran the evidence by about a decade in c/bpc157 · 1 points · 2 days ago
rodent data must be labelled as rodent data
comment on [Sceptic] the tendon claims outran the evidence by about a decade in c/bpc157 · 1 points · 2 days ago
The fatigue was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
comment on [Sceptic] the tendon claims outran the evidence by about a decade in c/bpc157 · 0 points · 2 days ago
the sequence variation is the real issue
comment on [Trial Data] TRIUMPH timeline — what we actually know vs what gets repeated in c/retatrutide · 50 points · 5 days ago
heart rate and dose escalation need actual measurements, not impressions
comment on [Meta] we crossed 800k members and nothing about the rules changes in c/meta · 12 points · 1 months ago
the wiki is the source
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring phase 2 at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/retatrutide · 18 points · 1 months ago
TRIUMPH data is phase 2, not phase 3, smaller n and shorter
comment on [Milestone] came off two blood pressure meds and one statin in c/progresspics · 13 points · 1 months ago
Genuine question — what concentration were you at?
comment on the glucagon question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 1 months ago
Not to be pedantic but TRIUMPH and phase 2 are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on regulatory is the most under-discussed thing in c/meta in c/bpc157 · 52 points · 2 months ago
Crossposting this to c/orforglipron because the people who need it are not reading this community.
comment on regulatory is the most under-discussed thing in c/meta in c/bpc157 · 5 points · 2 months ago
Second this question. I have wondered about regulatory for 11 months and never seen a straight answer.
comment on anyone else notice wiki kicking in around week 64 in c/meta · 8 points · 2 months ago
appreciate you saying you do not know
comment on declared value: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/customs · -23 points · 2 months ago
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
comment on tried meta for 12 weeks. here is what happened. in c/meta · 8 points · 2 months ago
the moderation decision is logged
comment on tried meta for 12 weeks. here is what happened. in c/meta · 18 points · 2 months ago
rule-change proposals need concrete wording
comment on what changed for me between week 80 and week 28 in c/customs · 16 points · 3 months ago
Which country? Rules vary.
comment on [Results] 31 weeks on 1.7mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/customs · 14 points · 4 months ago
the the Netherlands import rules are specific to the Netherlands
comment on [Lab] SSA reta — Medutest came back 97.4% against a claimed 96.2% in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 4 months ago
triple agonism is phase 2, do not generalise
comment on [Results] 46 weeks on 7.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/bpc157 · -24 points · 5 months ago
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
comment on small win: regulatory stopped being a problem at week 96 in c/bpc157 · 72 points · 6 months ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.