GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
348
c/bpc157·posted 4 days ago by u/rosa_almeida

[Sceptic] the tendon claims outran the evidence by about a decade

Sceptic Clean Column ×6

Genuinely asking, not being difficult.

Everyone in c/scamalerts repeats that regulatory is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 11 threads of people agreeing with each other.

Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is true because it has been repeated since 2023?

I am not trying to be the "source?" guy. I would just like a source.

395 up / 47 down89% upvoted25 commentsid 1waalv26 Jul 2026

25 comments

21 in this archive, depth 5

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/katrin_girard20 points·3 days ago

What are you comparing it against though?

replysharereportpermalink
u/mei_serrano-15 points·3 days ago

the sequence variation is the real issue

replysharereportpermalink
u/ilias_kaufmann10 points·3 days ago

Came off after 68 weeks for financial reasons. Regained about a third over the following year. Back on now at a much lower dose.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kaplan_meier_kim9 points·2 days ago

Second this question. I have wondered about tendon for 23 months and never seen a straight answer.

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]7 points·2 days ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/karim_hartmann2 points·2 days ago

pentadecapeptide is regulatory, the supply chain naming is a mess

replysharereportpermalink
u/lina_novak2 points·2 days ago

Not to be pedantic but sequence and pentadecapeptide are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lina_novak2 points·2 days ago

Slight fix: the number was 98.7, not 98.3. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

replysharereportpermalink
u/marta_weiss1 point·2 days ago

the regulatory rodent evidence is solid, human evidence is not

replysharereportpermalink
u/elin_varga5 points·3 days ago

handlers in the community are rare and cautious

replysharereportpermalink
u/karim_restrepo1 point·2 days ago

No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.

replysharereportpermalink
u/bruno_dumitru1 point·2 days ago

sequence and naming claims need the actual sequence

replysharereportpermalink
u/hugo_bergstrom1 point·2 days ago

the sequence literature looks promising but rodent-only

replysharereportpermalink
u/rosa_almeidaOP1 point·2 days ago

rodent data must be labelled as rodent data

replysharereportpermalink
u/rasmus_kimani2 points·2 days ago

Slight fix: the number was 96.8, not 98.0. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

replysharereportpermalink
u/nurse_ish_20254 points·2 days ago

Maintenance for 17 months now. Weight moves within about 3kg and the dose is a quarter of what it peaked at.

replysharereportpermalink
u/hugo_bergstrom3 points·2 days ago

BPC pentadecapeptide is a naming problem, three things are called this

replysharereportpermalink
u/rasmus_kimani1 point·2 days ago

near-zero controlled human data, full stop

replysharereportpermalink
u/honest_syringe241 point·2 days ago

Second this question. I have wondered about pentadecapeptide for 23 months and never seen a straight answer.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rosa_almeidaOP0 points·2 days ago

the sequence variation is the real issue

replysharereportpermalink
u/rosa_almeidaOP1 point·2 days ago

The fatigue was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/bpc157

BPC-157 as it actually is: a pentadecapeptide with a genuinely interesting rodent tendon-and-gut literature, near-zero controlled human data, a naming and sequence mess in the supply chain, and a regulatory status that changed sharply in several countries.

35kmembers
62submissions
Mar 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/bpc157 rules
  1. Research use only. No human protocols, no injection instructions.
  2. Rodent data must be labelled as rodent data in the body.
  3. Sequence and naming claims need the actual sequence.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.