GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Sceptic] the tendon claims outran the evidence by about a decade — 25 comments in the full submission. View in context.
348
c/bpc157·submitted 4 days ago by u/rosa_almeida

[Sceptic] the tendon claims outran the evidence by about a decade

Scepticbranch of 6 comments

Genuinely asking, not being difficult. Everyone in c/scamalerts repeats that regulatory is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 11 threads of people agreeing with each other. Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is true…

Read the full submission and all 25 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 2 days ago
u/kaplan_meier_kim9 points·2 days ago

Second this question. I have wondered about tendon for 23 months and never seen a straight answer.

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]7 points·2 days ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/karim_hartmann2 points·2 days ago

pentadecapeptide is regulatory, the supply chain naming is a mess

replysharereportpermalink
u/lina_novak2 points·2 days ago

Not to be pedantic but sequence and pentadecapeptide are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lina_novak2 points·2 days ago

Slight fix: the number was 98.7, not 98.3. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

replysharereportpermalink
u/marta_weiss1 point·2 days ago

the regulatory rodent evidence is solid, human evidence is not

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/bpc157

BPC-157 as it actually is: a pentadecapeptide with a genuinely interesting rodent tendon-and-gut literature, near-zero controlled human data, a naming and sequence mess in the supply chain, and a regulatory status that changed sharply in several countries.

35kmembers
62submissions
Mar 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/bpc157
c/bpc157 rules
  1. Research use only. No human protocols, no injection instructions.
  2. Rodent data must be labelled as rodent data in the body.
  3. Sequence and naming claims need the actual sequence.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/bpc_scepticu/sequence_checkeru/rui_only_ro
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →