what changed for me between week 80 and week 28
Right, the import question again, but with numbers this time.
I have 13 data points over 28 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.
The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 13, not week 62. People give up long before the interesting part.
Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Strongly agree. Jurisdiction matters.
always state your country, advice from another jurisdiction can harm you
always state your country, advice from another jurisdiction can harm you
Adding to this: declared value is doing more work than the comment implies.
Small correction: the trial was 12 weeks, not 16. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
Strongly agree. Jurisdiction matters.
Strongly agree.
Disagree on that part. 98.7% and 98.9% on the same vial is normal.
seizure letters: redact everything identifying
Strongly agree. Jurisdiction matters.
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
Which country? Rules vary.
personal-import allowances differ by country
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with personal import, not with what you concluded.
the the Netherlands import rules are specific to the Netherlands
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
research-use documentation is not a magic word
What was in the seizure letter?
Not to be pedantic but customs and declared value are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
- 1Strongly agree. Jurisdiction matters.8 comments in this branch · started by u/ferran_krastev
- 2always state your country, advice from another jurisdiction can harm you5 comments in this branch · started by u/ignacio_vanhecke