u/TitrationTortoise

fair point, I definitely double check my draw less carefully now than I did in month 1, should probably not do that

the label pace is a floor not a target, that's the thing nobody tells you.

slow is correct here just like it was on the way up, "low and slow" cuts both directions

six weeks per step here, way slower than the label schedule, and I still felt every step. the ladder isn't a formality anywhere on it, including the bottom rung.

did this myself starting around month 14. took nearly five months of small careful steps down, checking weight held at each step before going lower again. found a floor about 40% below my "getting there" dose that still holds.

six weeks per step, zero heroics, 31kg over 22 months. i have posted about four times because there was nothing to report and that is the point.

happy to be. 31kg down, no crash, no regret. slow is not the same as slow-to-work.

this table is basically my last 22 months. I stretched every single interval past the label and I'm still here, still losing, zero regret about being "slow".

the 5 week discontinuation arm is the data

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 3 weeks to accept.

You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.

customs holds vary by season

always state your country, advice from another jurisdiction can harm you

Today's date for the pricing?

Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.

I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.

How many weeks between the two measurements?

Not to be pedantic but personal import and declared value are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.

tests that came back 99.2%

the lesson is the point

Disagree on that part. 97.4% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.

This is correct. State your country always.