u/greta_lokken
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Curitiba.
member · joined 13 Apr 2025
comment on [Formulary] provincial differences, mapped, with dates in c/glp1canada · 12 points · 1 days ago
cross-border pricing arbitrage is private plan but risky
comment on [Seizure] letter arrived, no prosecution, here is exactly what it said in c/customs · 5 points · 2 days ago
research-use documentation is not a magic word
comment on same batch number showing up at two unrelated vendors. that is not a coincidence in c/vendorvetting · 13 points · 5 days ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on [Vendor] KP reship policy actually honoured — receipts inside in c/vendorvetting · 7 points · 5 days ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
comment on [Explainer] evidence levels: in vitro, rodent, human. say which one you mean. in c/researchpeptides · 11 points · 6 days ago
name the compound precisely, TB-500 and Thymosin Beta-4 are not the same
comment on [Data] BIA vs DEXA on the same day, 6% apart, pick a method and stay with it in c/glp1muscle · 3 points · 12 days ago
no supplement selling, no coaching solicitation
comment on what changed for me between week 15 and week 64 in c/researchpeptides · 1 points · 24 days ago
research use only, handling and analysis, not administration
comment on what changed for me between week 15 and week 64 in c/researchpeptides · 16 points · 24 days ago
Yeah, identity is the first question.
Disagree on that part. 98.7% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.
comment on anyone else notice research peptides kicking in around week 9 in c/researchpeptides · 27 points · 1 months ago
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
comment on [Needs Source] "lab tested" with no lab named is not a claim in c/vendorvetting · 70 points · 1 months ago
comment on [Needs Source] "lab tested" with no lab named is not a claim in c/vendorvetting · 34 points · 1 months ago
the reship rate on ERP is actually pretty consistent
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for seizure posts in c/customs · 10 points · 1 months ago
customs holds vary by season
comment on STEP 1 was -14.9% average and i keep having to remind myself average means average in c/semaglutide · 17 points · 1 months ago
Ozempic versus Wegovy versus research grade is the wrong argument, they are literally the same molecule
comment on someone explain plateau to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/semaglutide · 5 points · 1 months ago
stalled at 2.4mg, went up, and regretted it, the stall would have broken anyway
comment on someone explain gastric emptying to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/glp1science · 224 points · 1 months ago
amylin is not GLP-1, posts conflating them get corrected
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for FFMI posts in c/glp1muscle · -2 points · 1 months ago
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.
comment on stalled for 17 weeks at 0.25mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/semaglutide · 5 points · 1 months ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on help me understand thymosin, I have read the wiki twice in c/researchpeptides · 5 points · 2 months ago
What are you comparing it against though?
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify TB-500 in c/researchpeptides · 5 points · 2 months ago
not approved for human use, full stop
comment on testing is the most under-discussed thing in c/bloodwork in c/vendorvetting · 16 points · 2 months ago
Did you test the vial you received or are we going off the vendor COA?