[Needs Source] "lab tested" with no lab named is not a claim
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.
The claim: PeptideMeter matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 6 months without either producing anything.
What would actually settle it is 37 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.
If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.
best — the order this archive was captured in
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
did they reship, credit, or ghost you?
Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.
receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule
the reship rate on SWB is actually pretty consistent
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with Janoshik, not with what you concluded.
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.
How many orders from MKM is that a sample of? One reship is noise, five is a pattern.
independent test or vendor COA, which is it
receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule
the reship rate on ERP is actually pretty consistent
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
independent test or vendor COA, which is it
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
QYB order #17, Germany, no drama, receipts inside
How many orders from WWB is that a sample of? One reship is noise, five is a pattern.
How many orders from WWB is that a sample of?
Adding to this: order records is doing more work than the comment implies.
referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
Adding to this: VendorInvestigate is doing more work than the comment implies.
- 1Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with Janoshik, not with what…9 comments in this branch · started by u/matias_falk
- 2this deserves more than 12 upvotes7 comments in this branch · started by u/greta_lokken