GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Needs Source] "lab tested" with no lab named is not a claim — 28 comments in the full submission. View in context.
324
c/vendorvetting·submitted 1 months ago by u/greta_perrin

[Needs Source] "lab tested" with no lab named is not a claim

Needs Sourcebranch of 9 comments

Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: PeptideMeter matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 6 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 37 people measuring the…

Read the full submission and all 28 comments →

This branch

9 comments, started 1 months ago
u/matias_falk43 points·1 months ago

Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with Janoshik, not with what you concluded.

replysharereportpermalink
u/janoshik_junkieMOD28 points·1 months ago

Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.

replysharereportpermalink
u/boots_or_bust17 points·1 months ago

Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.

replysharereportpermalink
u/greta_perrinOP12 points·1 months ago

How many orders from MKM is that a sample of? One reship is noise, five is a pattern.

replysharereportpermalink
u/viktor_girard11 points·1 months ago·edited

independent test or vendor COA, which is it

replysharereportpermalink
u/lane_map_larrylogistics5 points·1 months ago

receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule

replysharereportpermalink
u/greta_lokken34 points·1 months ago

the reship rate on ERP is actually pretty consistent

replysharereportpermalink
u/zofia_lindholm21 points·1 months ago

You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.

replysharereportpermalink
u/receipts_or_nothingvetting14 points·1 months ago

independent test or vendor COA, which is it

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.