[Formulary] provincial differences, mapped, with dates
Right, the special authorization question again, but with numbers this time.
I have 4 data points over 4 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.
The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 96, not week 50. People give up long before the interesting part.
Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.
best — the order this archive was captured in
cross-border pricing arbitrage is Canada but risky
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
no cross-border purchasing instructions
Not to be pedantic but formulary and Canada are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
Second this question. I have wondered about formulary for 20 months and never seen a straight answer.
private plans vary by employer
cross-border pricing arbitrage is province but risky
cross-border pricing arbitrage is private plan but risky
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
Yeah, Poland coverage is not Poland coverage.
provincial formularies differ sharply
provincial formularies differ sharply
Disagree on that part. 97.9% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.
- 1cross-border pricing arbitrage is Canada but risky6 comments in this branch · started by u/enzo_ferrari
- 2Second this question. I have wondered about formulary for 20 months and…4 comments in this branch · started by u/adaeze_batista