[Question] how do you actually verify TB-500
Been lurking in c/cagrilintide for about 21 months and finally have something worth posting.
Short version: week 32, 5mg, and secretagogue is the bit I still cannot get a straight answer on. I have read the wiki, I have read the last 35 threads, and the answers split roughly down the middle.
What I actually want to know is whether the people saying it does not matter have measured it, or whether it is just repeated confidently. Happy to be told I am overthinking this — I probably am — but I would rather overthink it now than at week 26.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
not approved for human use, full stop
Strongly agree. Evidence level matters.
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
Strongly agree.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 40 weeks to accept.
Yeah, identity is the first question.
Did anything else change in the same window?
name the compound precisely, TB-500 and Thymosin Beta-4 are not the same
everything else in the vial drawer, handling
purity and identity are two questions
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
Strongly agree. Evidence level matters.
How many weeks between the two measurements?
not approved for human use, full stop
not approved for human use, full stop
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
What are you comparing it against though?
- 1purity and identity are two questions7 comments in this branch · started by u/sofia_petrescu
- 2wrong community but useful, so, shrug5 comments in this branch · started by u/cesar_oyelaran