u/sofia_danquah
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Rosario.
member · joined 14 May 2025
comment on [Explainer] why 1mL syringes cause overdoses and 0.3mL ones do not in c/reconstitution · 25 points · 4 days ago
dosing errors come from people reconstituting two vials differently and forgetting which is which
Disagree on that part. 97.9% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Lane Report] Guangzhou → Australia, 11 days, ice pack gone but powder intact in c/intlshipping · 60 points · 6 days ago
no tracking numbers, no full addresses, no label photos — instant removal
comment on telehealth prescriber asked me three questions and approved me. that is not care. in c/compounding · 17 points · 7 days ago
regulatory claims need a citation to the actual rule, not interpretation
comment on [COA] what does "related substances 1.4%" actually mean for my vial in c/coa · 1 points · 11 days ago
area% is not mass%, and here is exactly why it matters
comment on does insulin syringe actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/reconstitution · 6 points · 18 days ago
dead space is real and the syringe matters
comment on MASH vs biopsy — genuinely asking which matters more in c/survodutide · 1 points · 25 days ago
glucagon injection is a different vector than GLP-1
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 69 weeks to accept.
comment on [Discussion] glucagon is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/survodutide · 12 points · 29 days ago
glucagon injection is a different vector than GLP-1
comment on [Meta] the research peptides rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/researchpeptides · 21 points · 1 months ago
Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on [Discussion] mg/mL is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/reconstitution · 14 points · 1 months ago
Are you using a u-100 or u-40 syringe? That changes everything.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about batch in c/coa · 75 points · 1 months ago
purity and net content are two different numbers, same vial
comment on [Results] 26 weeks on 5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/reconstitution · -19 points · 1 months ago
stopper coring on the 2th draw because you keep using the same entry point. rotate.
comment on why does nobody talk about purity in c/coa · 9 points · 1 months ago
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.
comment on anyone else notice API source kicking in around week 89 in c/compounding · 47 points · 2 months ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify TB-500 in c/researchpeptides · 8 points · 2 months ago
Strongly agree. Evidence level matters.
comment on [Question] the UK — has anyone got a straight answer on COA in c/coa · 10 points · 2 months ago
chromatogram or it did not happen
comment on am I the only one who found API source harder than the injections in c/compounding · 6 points · 2 months ago
This is correct. The shortage list does expire and the rules change.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring purity at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/coa · 5 points · 3 months ago
Strongly agree. Mass% and area% are answering different questions on the same document.
comment on [Question] what went wrong — what am I missing here in c/darkspot · 5 points · 3 months ago
Genuine question — what concentration were you at?
comment on the shortage list question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/compounding · 7 points · 3 months ago
Did they tell you their API source or dodge the question?
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for certificate of analysis posts in c/coa · 34 points · 3 months ago
Water content on the document? That affects your concentration math.