u/liv_kuipers
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Kaunas.
member · joined 12 Mar 2025
Overview — page 3 of 3
comment on three years of REDEFINE threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/cagrilintide · 102 points · 1 year ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
comment on small win: goal weight stopped being a problem at week 20 in c/maintenancephase · 142 points · 1 year ago
lowest effective dose is lowest effective dose, find it or stay higher
comment on small win: goal weight stopped being a problem at week 20 in c/maintenancephase · 45 points · 1 year ago
dose-stretching experiences welcome, dose-stretching instructions are not
comment on [Results] 96 weeks on 2.4mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/maintenancephase · 96 points · 1 year ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
comment on Spain: reship, and what it actually costs here in c/vendorvetting · 54 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, WXT took 16 days and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
comment on Spain: reship, and what it actually costs here in c/vendorvetting · 783 points · 1 year ago
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
comment on small win: REDEFINE stopped being a problem at week 21 in c/cagrilintide · 1 points · 1 year ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on [Discussion] the appeal advice in here is 3 years out of date in c/insurancefights · 126 points · 1 year ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
comment on unpopular opinion: regain is massively overrated in c/maintenancephase · 9 points · 1 year ago
regain after taper is expected, plan for it
comment on tried interval stretching for 15 weeks. here is what happened. in c/tapering · 37 points · 1 year ago
cite the discontinuation data rather than guessing regain rates
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify dose stretching in c/maintenancephase · 3 points · 1 year ago
Maintenance for 10 months now.
Disagree on that part. 98.7% and 98.9% on the same vial is normal.
comment on does vendor actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/vendorvetting · 216 points · 1 year ago
Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.
comment on [Question] dose stretching — what am I missing here in c/maintenancephase · 19 points · 1 year ago
regain after taper is expected, plan for it
comment on lowest effective dose — 4 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/maintenancephase · 54 points · 2 years ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on long term vs lowest effective dose — genuinely asking which matters more in c/maintenancephase · 3 points · 2 years ago
nobody posts about this part and it is the longest part
comment on why does nobody talk about order records in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 2 years ago
the Janoshik result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number
Adding to this: Medutest is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on week 86 check-in — 31kg down, muscle cramps manageable, one thing confusing me in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 2 years ago
the batch number or it did not happen