u/lukas_vermeulen
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Oulu.
member · joined 16 Jul 2025
Comments — page 2 of 4
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for co-agonism posts in c/cagrilintide · 12 points · 6 months ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for co-agonism posts in c/cagrilintide · 75 points · 6 months ago
REDEFINE which arm?
comment on three years of test results threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/labresults · 70 points · 6 months ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for co-agonism posts in c/cagrilintide · 1 points · 6 months ago
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for co-agonism posts in c/cagrilintide · 186 points · 6 months ago
the amylin agonist pool is small, community is CagriSema
comment on [Results] 46 weeks on 1.7mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/cagrilintide · 9 points · 6 months ago
the mechanism is different, the side effect profile reflects it
comment on week 61 check-in — 41kg down, nausea manageable, one thing confusing me in c/cagrilintide · 15 points · 7 months ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on anyone else notice co-agonism kicking in around week 5 in c/cagrilintide · 46 points · 7 months ago
Half-life is about 168 hours, so steady state lands around week 10–5. Practical consequence: what you feel in week 1 is not what that dose does.
comment on telehealth — my 11-week log, condensed into one table in c/compounding · 1 points · 9 months ago
regulatory claims need a citation to the actual rule, not interpretation
comment on tried Medutest for 15 weeks. here is what happened. in c/labresults · 122 points · 10 months ago
Yeah, the PeptideMeter number matching the claim is the actual signal.
comment on test results: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/labresults · 56 points · 11 months ago
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about fertility in c/glp1women · 70 points · 11 months ago
Week 49 for me and the honest summary is: 17kg down, reflux manageable, and I have thought about food maybe four times today.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about fertility in c/glp1women · 24 points · 11 months ago
This is correct. PCOS is real.
comment on [Results] 61 weeks on 1.7mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/compounding · 79 points · 11 months ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
comment on [Vendor] QST order #8 — Canada, 7 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/labresults · 6 points · 12 months ago
reship and retest is the honest way to handle a low result
comment on below spec — 3 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/darkspot · 6 points · 1 year ago
heavily moderated for cruelty, not pessimism
comment on below spec — 3 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/darkspot · -26 points · 1 year ago
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
comment on tried PeptideMeter for 23 weeks. here is what happened. in c/labresults · 50 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 69 weeks to accept.
comment on switched from 1.0mg to 0.5mg and the constipation got better, not worse in c/labresults · 596 points · 1 year ago
multiple batches from SSA show a spread, that is the data
comment on what went wrong is the most under-discussed thing in c/progresspics in c/darkspot · -10 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. No piling on.