u/neha_erdogan
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Salvador.
member · joined 13 Apr 2025
comment on [Win] four denials, three appeals, one external review, approved in c/insurancefights · 3 points · 2 days ago
Did you get step therapy or outright denial?
comment on [Template] my appeal letter, take it, it is free in c/insurancefights · 6 points · 2 days ago
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
comment on [Question] which networks do vendors actually credit reliably in c/cryptopay · 24 points · 4 days ago
chargeback rights are escrow: zero
comment on [Explainer] the crypto discount is real and so is losing chargeback rights in c/cryptopay · 9 points · 8 days ago
chargeback rights are USDC: zero
comment on [Suspicious] identical chromatogram on two different compounds from the same vendor in c/coa · 258 points · 10 days ago
area% is not mass%, and here is exactly why it matters
comment on [Discussion] denial reason codes decoded, mostly fixable paperwork in c/insurancefights · 1 points · 16 days ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on [Warning] the "send it again and we will refund the first" message is always a scam in c/cryptopay · 11 points · 17 days ago
Strongly agree. Escrow is non-negotiable for groups.
comment on [Warning] the "send it again and we will refund the first" message is always a scam in c/cryptopay · 4 points · 17 days ago
network selection matters, wrong chain is the expensive typo
comment on net peptide content vs purity — two different numbers, same vial in c/coa · 9 points · 22 days ago
axis labels included, always
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 54 weeks to accept.
comment on province — my 19-week log, condensed into one table in c/glp1canada · 1 points · 26 days ago
Genuine question — what concentration were you at?
comment on chargeback is the most under-discussed thing in c/sideeffects in c/cryptopay · 24 points · 26 days ago
Strongly agree. Escrow is non-negotiable for groups.
comment on someone explain gas fees to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/cryptopay · 11 points · 1 months ago
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
comment on someone explain gas fees to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/cryptopay · 20 points · 1 months ago
the 21% discount versus 29% network fees
comment on someone explain gas fees to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/cryptopay · 27 points · 1 months ago
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
comment on why does nobody talk about purity in c/coa · 5 points · 1 months ago
the method line is doing real work, not just window dressing
Disagree on that part. 99.3% and 93.7% on the same vial is normal.
comment on anyone else notice certificate of analysis kicking in around week 75 in c/coa · 20 points · 1 months ago
The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.
comment on the prior authorization question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/insurancefights · 13 points · 1 months ago
This is correct. Appeal letters work.
comment on denial — my 12-week log, condensed into one table in c/insurancefights · 39 points · 2 months ago
step therapy documentation is the weapon, use it
comment on anyone else notice formulary kicking in around week 55 in c/glp1canada · 4 points · 2 months ago
name your province, coverage is provincial
comment on someone explain external review to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/insurancefights · 1 points · 2 months ago
the carve-out clause varies by employer