Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Cali.
member · joined 12 Mar 2025
Overview — page 4 of 5
comment on dual agonist — my 21-week log, condensed into one table in c/survodutide · 5 points · 7 months ago
the heart rate signal is real in the data
Disagree on that part. 96.8% and 96.2% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Results] 67 weeks, 16kg, and A1c was the hard part in c/bloodwork · 47 points · 7 months ago
This is correct. ApoB is the better marker.
comment on someone explain non-scale victory to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/progresspics · 27 points · 7 months ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on [Meta] the prior authorization rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/insurancefights · 8 points · 8 months ago
resubmission after denial requires new documentation
comment on [Meta] the prior authorization rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/insurancefights · 2 points · 8 months ago
Copay was formulary for the copay then another 16% of the total. Read the actual plan document.
comment on [Meta] the prior authorization rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/insurancefights · 3 points · 8 months ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on [Meta] the prior authorization rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/insurancefights · -20 points · 8 months ago
Copay was step therapy for the copay then another 20% of the total. Read the actual plan document.
Right, the denial question again, but with numbers this time. I have 7 data points over 20 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and…
comment on rodent data: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/bpc157 · -11 points · 8 months ago
handlers in the community are rare and cautious
comment on tried hair loss for 14 weeks. here is what happened. in c/sideeffects · 40 points · 8 months ago
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
comment on the below spec question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/labresults · 41 points · 8 months ago
The Janoshik result at 98.9% was below the 99.2% claim. QST retested at their cost and came back 98.9%. Logged as resolved.
comment on small win: fertility stopped being a problem at week 55 in c/glp1women · 2 points · 8 months ago
fertility signal is there but unclear
comment on small win: fertility stopped being a problem at week 55 in c/glp1women · 6 points · 8 months ago
Came off after 32 weeks for financial reasons. Regained about a third over the following year. Back on now at a much lower dose.
comment on small win: fertility stopped being a problem at week 55 in c/glp1women · 9 points · 8 months ago
the cycle tracking data matters, keep it private
Genuinely asking, not being difficult. Everyone in c/orforglipron repeats that insulin resistance is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and…
comment on is it normal to get sulphur burps at week 30 in c/cryptopay · 14 points · 9 months ago
This is correct. Gas fees are real costs.
comment on someone explain bloodwork to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/bloodwork · -16 points · 9 months ago
post reference ranges with your numbers, units differ by country and lab
comment on nobody warned me about the food-noise thing and I would have liked the warning in c/insurancefights · 7 points · 9 months ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on nobody warned me about the food-noise thing and I would have liked the warning in c/insurancefights · 41 points · 9 months ago
do not suggest misrepresenting a diagnosis, that is fraud
comment on 21 months in and sulphur burps is still the thing I get wrong in c/sideeffects · 64 points · 9 months ago
constipation is real, boring, and fixable
No trophies yet. Most accounts here never get one.
Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.
sigmaaldrich.comSeveral compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.
Reference