u/patient_labslip_log
I post rarely and I check my numbers twice.
newer member · joined 24 Mar 2024
Comments — page 3 of 5
comment on [PSA] tapering is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/tapering · 5 points · 6 months ago
say how long you were on and at what dose before taper
comment on [Discussion] reimbursement is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/glp1eu · 53 points · 6 months ago
apotheke, receta, pharmacy — twenty-seven different answers
comment on help me understand MASH, I have read the wiki twice in c/survodutide · 1 points · 6 months ago
not approved, descriptive posts only
comment on help me understand MASH, I have read the wiki twice in c/survodutide · 49 points · 6 months ago
My version of this: I was so worried about the injection that I put it off for eleven days. The injection is the easiest part.
comment on [Results] 22 weeks, 16kg, and goal was the hard part in c/progresspics · 158 points · 7 months ago
Yeah, text-only removes the comparison.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about handling in c/researchpeptides · 81 points · 7 months ago
thymosin fragments, GH secretagogues, secretagogue, long tail
comment on small win: TB-500 stopped being a problem at week 21 in c/researchpeptides · 15 points · 7 months ago
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
comment on dual agonist — my 21-week log, condensed into one table in c/survodutide · 38 points · 7 months ago
the GLP-1/glucagon dual is glucagon, different from GIP/GLP-1
comment on survodutide vs glucagon — genuinely asking which matters more in c/survodutide · 15 points · 8 months ago
Not to be pedantic but dual agonist and hepatic fat are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on survodutide vs glucagon — genuinely asking which matters more in c/survodutide · 20 points · 8 months ago
This is correct. Do not generalise from tirzepatide.
comment on survodutide vs glucagon — genuinely asking which matters more in c/survodutide · 13 points · 8 months ago
Small correction: the trial was 23 weeks, not 25. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on survodutide vs glucagon — genuinely asking which matters more in c/survodutide · 6 points · 8 months ago
phase 8 data is interesting, phase 28 will be different
comment on the MASH question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/survodutide · 7 points · 8 months ago
comment on goal — my 15-week log, condensed into one table in c/progresspics · 13 points · 8 months ago
text removes the body-shaming pile-on
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 37 weeks to accept.
comment on goal — my 15-week log, condensed into one table in c/progresspics · 168 points · 8 months ago
the community is deliberately image-free
Disagree on that part. 94.2% and 95.1% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Results] 82 weeks, 15kg, and progress was the hard part in c/progresspics · 253 points · 9 months ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on [Results] 82 weeks, 15kg, and progress was the hard part in c/progresspics · 142 points · 9 months ago
This is correct. Process matters more than the number.
comment on [PSA] order records is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/vendorvetting · 292 points · 10 months ago
comment on reading identity threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/researchpeptides · 41 points · 1 year ago
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
comment on my A1c moved and I cannot work out whether interval stretching is why in c/tapering · 8 points · 1 year ago
tapering instructions are not welcome here