0
small win: confirmations stopped being a problem at week 90
Week 61 update. 7kg down from the start, reflux basically gone since about week 6. Things that worked: consistency, protein at breakfast, walking more than I want to.…
u/reverse_image_ron
Every "our facility" photo gets reverse-searched. You would be amazed.
member · joined 30 Jul 2024
1,904post karma
2,918comment karma
5submissions
74comments
Overview — page 2 of 4
comment on [Regret] chased the scale instead of the labs for a year in c/darkspot · 18 points · 1 months ago
What are you comparing it against though?
comment on three years of HPLC threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/hplc · -33 points · 1 months ago
two labs, two different baselines, two different purity numbers, both honest
comment on three years of HPLC threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/hplc · 34 points · 1 months ago
This is the correct method framing. Column and gradient are load-bearing fields.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify below spec in c/darkspot · 27 points · 1 months ago
Yeah, the lesson matters.
comment on [Lab] SSA cagri — Medutest came back 97.4% against a claimed 96.2% in c/hplc · 22 points · 1 months ago
What was the column and what gradient?
comment on unpopular opinion: method development is massively overrated in c/hplc · 76 points · 2 months ago
a round-robin on baseline integration would be genuinely useful
comment on unpopular opinion: purity is massively overrated in c/hplc · 1 points · 2 months ago
chromatogram or it did not happen
comment on [Results] 22 weeks, 15kg, and chargeback was the hard part in c/cryptopay · 47 points · 2 months ago
no group-buy recruitment, discussing how they fail is fine
comment on small win: chromatogram stopped being a problem at week 35 in c/hplc · 1 points · 2 months ago
related substances are where the story lives, not the main peak
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about research peptides until somebody posts a number in c/researchpeptides · 55 points · 2 months ago
evidence-level statements required: in vitro, rodent, or human
comment on small win: chromatogram stopped being a problem at week 35 in c/hplc · 73 points · 2 months ago
This is the correct method framing. Column and gradient are load-bearing fields.
comment on small win: confirmations stopped being a problem at week 90 in c/cryptopay · 1 points · 3 months ago
The discount was 97.9% but gas ate half of it. Still worth it but the math matters.
comment on small win: confirmations stopped being a problem at week 90 in c/cryptopay · 1 points · 3 months ago
Small correction: the trial was 8 weeks, not 39.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on small win: confirmations stopped being a problem at week 90 in c/cryptopay · 3 points · 3 months ago
Group buy used escrow. 23 people, 23 shipped without drama. Escrow is the insurance.
comment on tried failure for 9 weeks. here is what happened. in c/darkspot · 27 points · 3 months ago
decisions people would not make again
comment on tried failure for 9 weeks. here is what happened. in c/darkspot · 0 points · 3 months ago
still evidence-based: what went wrong, when, proof
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about what went wrong in c/darkspot · 17 points · 4 months ago
side effects that ended someone's run
comment on week 41 check-in — 37kg down, early fullness manageable, one thing confusing me in c/cryptopay · 16 points · 4 months ago
gas versus discount arithmetic is real
comment on someone explain HPLC to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/hplc · 19 points · 4 months ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.