u/santiago_rasmussen
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Kristiansand.
member · joined 10 Jan 2025
Comments — page 2 of 5
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify TB-500 in c/researchpeptides · 11 points · 2 months ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on [Vendor] QST order #10 — Spain, 31 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/glp1eu · 41 points · 3 months ago
Strongly agree. Pricing is local.
comment on [Vendor] QST order #10 — Spain, 31 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/glp1eu · 9 points · 3 months ago
the Spain answer is not the Spain answer
comment on small win: compounding stopped being a problem at week 40 in c/compounding · 16 points · 3 months ago
Moved states and the compounding landscape changed completely. Different rules, different pharmacies, different costs.
comment on small win: compounding stopped being a problem at week 40 in c/compounding · 4 points · 3 months ago
Yeah, 503A and 503B are different regulatory animals.
comment on small win: compounding stopped being a problem at week 40 in c/compounding · 43 points · 3 months ago
The telehealth + compounding combo cost telehealth plus 8% markup. Not cheap but covered by insurance depending on state.
comment on small win: exit scam stopped being a problem at week 56 in c/scamalerts · 1 points · 3 months ago
sock puppet accounts ask the same leading questions
comment on Medutest — 2 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/labresults · 61 points · 3 months ago
testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts
comment on help me understand API source, I have read the wiki twice in c/compounding · 86 points · 3 months ago
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
comment on bloodwork — my 15-week log, condensed into one table in c/bloodwork · 71 points · 4 months ago
ferritin tanks quietly on a reduced appetite, check it
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify reimbursement in c/glp1eu · 25 points · 4 months ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on [Question] gastric emptying — what am I missing here in c/glp1science · 98 points · 4 months ago
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
comment on why does nobody talk about API source in c/compounding · 62 points · 4 months ago
Are we talking 503A or 503B?
comment on [Results] 22 weeks, 30kg, and EU was the hard part in c/glp1eu · 1 points · 5 months ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on help me understand compounding, I have read the wiki twice in c/compounding · 8 points · 5 months ago
Yeah, 503A and 503B are different regulatory animals.
comment on why does nobody talk about shortage list in c/compounding · 34 points · 5 months ago
Strongly agree. API source transparency matters.
comment on someone explain research peptides to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/researchpeptides · 54 points · 5 months ago
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
comment on am I the only one who found baseline labs harder than the injections in c/bloodwork · 6 points · 5 months ago
ApoB over LDL-C, that is the hierarchy
comment on PDF metadata: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/scamalerts · 10 points · 6 months ago
The Medutest results I got back showed 97.4% but GL Biochem claimed 96.8%. Same vial, two services. I posted the receipts.
comment on three years of test results threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/labresults · 18 points · 6 months ago
testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts