3k
what would you tell week-1 you about compounding
I have had 17 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe. Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied…
u/solene_eriksen
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Tampere.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
6,699post karma
6,072comment karma
5submissions
82comments
Overview — page 4 of 5
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about compounding in c/compounding · 38 points · 1 year ago
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about compounding in c/compounding · 92 points · 1 year ago
no pharmacy referral codes, naming is fine, recruiting is not
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring 503B at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/compounding · 7 points · 1 year ago
the shortage list is temporary, it ends and compounding becomes illegal again
comment on [Results] 6 weeks on 12.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 1 year ago
vendor staff must self-identify, full stop
comment on [Results] 6 weeks on 12.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 1 year ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on [Discussion] the appeal advice in here is 3 years out of date in c/insurancefights · 25 points · 1 year ago
do not suggest misrepresenting a diagnosis, that is fraud
comment on [Results] 72 weeks, 15kg, and API source was the hard part in c/compounding · 28 points · 1 year ago
Did they tell you their API source or dodge the question?
comment on three years of state board threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/compounding · 12 points · 1 year ago
regulatory claims need a citation to the actual rule, not interpretation
comment on is it normal to get nausea at week 20 in c/glp1canada · 3 points · 1 year ago
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
comment on [Discussion] the PeptideMeter advice in here is 6 years out of date in c/vendorvetting · 3 points · 1 year ago
referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions
comment on testing: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/vendorvetting · 192 points · 1 year ago
referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions
comment on help me understand 503B, I have read the wiki twice in c/compounding · 1 points · 1 year ago
the shortage list is temporary, it ends and compounding becomes illegal again
comment on genuine question about external review that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/insurancefights · 3 points · 2 years ago
external review is the appeal after insurance says no
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for 503A posts in c/compounding · 8 points · 2 years ago
shortage list status is 503B, check the actual list
comment on [Discussion] testing is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/vendorvetting · 15 points · 2 years ago
SWB three times. First two perfect, third arrived with a gel pack failure. Powder tested 98.0% anyway, so no harm done.
comment on [Results] 17 weeks, 35kg, and special authorization was the hard part in c/glp1canada · 53 points · 2 years ago
Yeah, Germany coverage is not Germany coverage.
comment on reship vs Medutest — genuinely asking which matters more in c/vendorvetting · 411 points · 2 years ago
Batch number? Date? Method? Give us the load-bearing fields.
comment on my ApoB moved and I cannot work out whether 503A is why in c/compounding · 20 points · 2 years ago
Which state? Rules vary.
comment on tried reship for 12 weeks. here is what happened. in c/vendorvetting · 9 points · 2 years ago
did they reship, credit, or ghost you?