GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
951
c/vendorvetting·posted 2 years ago by u/marit_sandvik

tried reship for 12 weeks. here is what happened.

Discussion Cold Box ×6 Slow Clap ×1

vendor. That is the whole post, but I will justify it.

Everything else people worry about in c/insurancefights is downstream of it. Titration speed, reflux, the endless dose arguments — most of it resolves if you sort vendor out first, and almost nobody does.

I say this having got it wrong for 2 months. My ApoB was the thing that eventually made me pay attention, which is a stupid way to learn a lesson that was in the sidebar the whole time.

8,794 up / 7,843 down53% upvoted48 commentsid bmuoj027 Feb 2024

48 comments

17 in this archive, depth 4

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/laila_almeida147 points·2 years ago

I am going to push back on this slightly.

replysharereportpermalink
u/titration_marshalmod · c/semaglutide114 points·2 years ago

receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]108 points·2 years ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/spreadsheet_gremlindata82 points·2 years ago

BCH took 24 days to answer an email and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.

replysharereportpermalink
u/marit_sandvikOP43 points·2 years ago

Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.

replysharereportpermalink
u/nz_unfunded51 points·2 years ago

Crossposting this to c/glp1muscle because the people who need it are not reading this community.

replysharereportpermalink
u/valeria_cardoso39 points·2 years ago

Mechanistically the bit that matters is Medutest. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.

replysharereportpermalink
u/marit_sandvikOP18 points·2 years ago

First order from FGP was great, second one had a different batch and tested lower. The vendor retested and credited me. Logged it here.

replysharereportpermalink
u/dilara_weiss16 points·2 years ago·edited

GL Biochem order #16, France, no drama, receipts inside

replysharereportpermalink
u/sterile_field_steph49 points·2 years ago·edited

vendor staff must self-identify, full stop

replysharereportpermalink
u/elise_grimaldi-38 points·2 years ago

Reship, credit, or they ghosted you? That matters.

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (1) →
u/sig_figs_sammod · analytical27 points·2 years ago

the reship rate on QST is actually pretty consistent

replysharereportpermalink
u/solene_eriksen9 points·2 years ago·edited

did they reship, credit, or ghost you?

replysharereportpermalink
u/ruben_brandt7 points·2 years ago·edited

Order date, product, and result, in that order please?

replysharereportpermalink
u/marit_sandvikOP3 points·2 years ago

one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread

replysharereportpermalink
u/ledger_modMOD22 points·2 years ago

Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.