2k
[Discussion] we are measuring customs at the wrong time and calling it noise
Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful. Setup: 12.5mg, week 27, constipation present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable —…
u/teodor_lokken
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Coimbra.
member · joined 14 May 2025
11,585post karma
6,791comment karma
5submissions
72comments
Overview — page 3 of 4
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring customs at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/customs · 0 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, the Netherlands rules are not global.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring customs at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/customs · 79 points · 1 year ago
Stalled for 21 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 65.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring customs at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/customs · 57 points · 1 year ago
Maintenance for 10 months now. Weight moves within about 3kg and the dose is a quarter of what it peaked at.
comment on [Results] 96 weeks on 12.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/coa · 36 points · 1 year ago
Water content on the document? That affects your concentration math.
comment on [Results] 96 weeks on 12.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/coa · 43 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. Mass% and area% are answering different questions on the same document.
comment on [Results] 96 weeks on 12.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/coa · 90 points · 1 year ago
Sent one vial to Medutest and PeptideMeter. 98.3% and 98.4%. Cost me more than the vial did and I would do it again.
6.1k
[Results] 96 weeks on 12.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring
Week 27 update. 43kg down from the start, reflux basically gone since about week 79. Things that worked: consistency, protein at breakfast, walking more than I want to.…
comment on three years of certificate of analysis threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/coa · 193 points · 1 year ago
axis labels included, always
comment on three years of certificate of analysis threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/coa · 21 points · 1 year ago
area% is not mass%, and here is exactly why it matters
comment on CagriSema vs REDEFINE — genuinely asking which matters more in c/cagrilintide · 277 points · 1 year ago
the mechanism is different, the side effect profile reflects it
comment on week 11 check-in — 47kg down, the food-noise thing manageable, one thing confusing me in c/vendorvetting · 25 points · 1 year ago
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
comment on week 11 check-in — 47kg down, the food-noise thing manageable, one thing confusing me in c/vendorvetting · 23 points · 1 year ago
Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring reship at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/vendorvetting · 372 points · 1 year ago
did they reship, credit, or ghost you?
comment on reship — my 22-week log, condensed into one table in c/vendorvetting · 63 points · 1 year ago
the Janoshik result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number
comment on tapering vs regain — genuinely asking which matters more in c/tapering · 1 points · 1 year ago
cite the discontinuation data rather than guessing regain rates
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify regain in c/tapering · 20 points · 1 year ago
What was the batch number and which service?
comment on the COA question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/coa · 12 points · 1 year ago
Batch number and date of analysis? Both are load-bearing.
comment on stalled for 23 weeks at 5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/coa · 207 points · 1 year ago
Batch number and date of analysis? Both are load-bearing.
comment on stalled for 23 weeks at 5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/coa · -27 points · 1 year ago
What is the method line say? Not the technique, the actual method.