[Question] Australia — has anyone got a straight answer on rodent data
Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful.
Setup: 2.4mg, week 36, sulphur burps present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — regulatory — and tracked it for 23 weeks.
Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted it. So I am putting it here rather than presenting it as a finding. If two or three other people have done the same thing we might actually learn something.
Not medical advice, obviously. This is one person with a spreadsheet.
best — the order this archive was captured in
research use only, no human protocols, no injection instructions
research use only, no human protocols, no injection instructions
Adding to this: pentadecapeptide is doing more work than the comment implies.
research use only, no human protocols, no injection instructions
research use only, no human protocols, no injection instructions
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
I am going to push back on this slightly.
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
BPC pentadecapeptide is a naming problem, three things are called this
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with BPC-157, not with what you concluded.
Disagree.
Adding to this: rodent data is doing more work than the comment implies.
rodent data must be labelled as rodent data
pentadecapeptide is sequence, the supply chain naming is a mess
Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.
Strongly agree. Zero human controlled data.
- 1I am going to push back on this slightly.5 comments in this branch · started by u/food_noise_gone
- 2research use only, no human protocols, no injection instructions4 comments in this branch · started by u/incretin_ivy