£18 USB logger settled a three-week argument in thirty seconds
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: stability matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 9 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 23 people measuring the same…
data logger is the standard, gut feeling is not
data logger is the standard, gut feeling is not
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
no tracking numbers, no full addresses, no label photos — instant removal
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
excursion claims need a logger trace or a photo at unboxing, not "it felt warm"