[Discussion] the data logger advice in here is 6 years out of date
Right, the ice pack question again, but with numbers this time. I have 5 data points over 38 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign. The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am…
Do you have the logger trace?
time-at-temperature integral is the dose, not just peak temperature
time-at-temperature integral is the dose, not just peak temperature
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
[deleted]
Yeah, data logger is the only acceptable proof.
lyophilised powder is far more forgiving than reconstituted solution