anyone else notice lyophilised kicking in around week 80
Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom.
I have been tracking lyophilised against eGFR for 17 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here.
Caveats up front: one person, one lab, one assay, no control, and I changed my training in the middle of it, which was stupid.
tl;dr: probably real, definitely smaller than the threads imply, and not worth reorganising your week around.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Reconstituted or dry powder?
the logger trace is the data that matters, not the packaging promises
Reconstituted or dry powder?
Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
Reconstituted or dry powder?
data logger is the standard, gut feeling is not
France to France takes 4 days on average, variance is 36 days
data logger is the standard, gut feeling is not
Not to be pedantic but excursion and packaging are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
I am going to push back on this slightly.
This is correct. Dry powder is way more robust than liquid.
This is correct.
Disagree on that part. 95.1% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.
a warm courier van is a bigger problem for a mixed vial than for dry powder
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with stability, not with what you concluded.
stability after excursion is not zero, it is dose-dependent
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
excursion claims need a logger trace or a photo at unboxing, not "it felt warm"
data logger is the standard, gut feeling is not
- 1Reconstituted or dry powder?6 comments in this branch · started by u/aleksi_eriksen
- 2stability after excursion is not zero, it is dose-dependent4 comments in this branch · started by u/preservative_free_p