[Lab] SSA tirz — Medutest came back 97.4% against a claimed 96.2%
Week 55 update. 46kg down from the start, early fullness basically gone since about week 95.
Things that worked: consistency, protein at breakfast, walking more than I want to. Things that did not: everything I bought on the internet to help with early fullness.
The part that surprised me is how much of this is admin. Ordering, storing, logging, remembering. Nobody mentions that the hard bit is not the drug, it is the routine.
Happy to answer anything. Please do not ask me what dose you should be on.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Yeah, data logger is the only acceptable proof.
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
the logger trace is the data that matters, not the packaging promises
Reconstituted or dry powder?
excursion claims need a logger trace or a photo at unboxing, not "it felt warm"
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
excursion claims need a logger trace or a photo at unboxing, not "it felt warm"
excursion claims need a logger trace or a photo at unboxing, not "it felt warm"
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
no tracking numbers, no full addresses, no label photos — instant removal
no tracking numbers, no full addresses, no label photos — instant removal
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
The gel pack lasted 10 hours in a courier van, then liquid. Powder itself fine, the cold chain mostly died in transit.
The gel pack lasted 5 hours in a courier van, then liquid. Powder itself fine, the cold chain mostly died in transit.
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
Spain to Spain: 21 days with QSC and 23 days with GL Biochem. Same route, different carriers, variance is real.
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.
Strongly agree. Peak temperature is not the whole story.
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
Strongly agree. Peak temperature is not the whole story.
Slight fix: the number was 97.2, not 97.4. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
customs clearance often breaks the cold chain, factor that in
customs clearance often breaks the cold chain, factor that in
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
customs clearance often breaks the cold chain, factor that in
Strongly agree. Peak temperature is not the whole story.
time-at-temperature integral is the dose, not just peak temperature
time-at-temperature integral is the dose, not just peak temperature
Disagree on that part. 95.1% and 96.2% on the same vial is normal.
- 1Yeah, data logger is the only acceptable proof.7 comments in this branch · started by u/ewan_tulloch
- 2no tracking numbers, no full addresses, no label photos — instant removal7 comments in this branch · started by u/spain_receta