does lyophilised actually matter or is it forum lore at this point
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: packaging matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 19 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 13 people measuring the same…
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
Removed a chain here.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 81 weeks to accept.
data logger is the standard, gut feeling is not
stability after excursion is not zero, it is dose-dependent
customs clearance often breaks the cold chain, factor that in
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
lane reports need origin, destination, carrier, and actual transit days
Slight fix: the number was 98.0, not 98.1. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
Slight fix: the number was 98.0, not 98.1.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 84 weeks to accept.
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
the logger trace is the data that matters, not the packaging promises
Small correction: the trial was 13 weeks, not 3. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
Small correction: the trial was 13 weeks, not 3.
Adding to this: packaging is doing more work than the comment implies.
a warm courier van is a bigger problem for a mixed vial than for dry powder