[Meta] proposal — a flair for escrow posts
Something I noticed reading old threads that I have not seen said out loud.
The advice on gas fees in this community changed substantially around the start of last year, and nobody went back and updated the older posts. So depending on which thread the search engine hands you, you get two contradictory answers with the same confidence.
I have listed what I think the current consensus is below. Correct me — that is the point of posting it.
best — the order this archive was captured in
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
I am going to push back on this slightly.
Did you check confirmation speed on that chain?
network selection matters, wrong chain is the expensive typo
Did you check confirmation speed on that chain?
Adding to this: gas fees is doing more work than the comment implies.
USDC exists on 19 networks, vendor credits are network-specific
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
Strongly agree. Escrow is non-negotiable for groups.
gas versus discount arithmetic is real
Yeah, the network selection matters most.
This is correct. Gas fees are real costs.
Strongly agree. Escrow is non-negotiable for groups.
Yeah, the network selection matters most.
The discount was 96.8% but gas ate half of it. Still worth it but the math matters.
escrow for group buys is standard, use it
- 1Did you check confirmation speed on that chain?4 comments in this branch · started by u/nils_ferreira