u/milan_mensah
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Cali.
member · joined 13 Apr 2025
comment on [Explainer] confirmations, memos, and the three ways to lose money by typo in c/cryptopay · 38 points · 2 days ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on [Trial Data] STEP 1 vs SURMOUNT-1 side by side, with the caveats in c/trialwatch · 5 points · 6 days ago
the 23 week readout is different from the 20 week readout
comment on [Country] SE/NO/DK — Norway is the outlier and not in a good way in c/glp1eu · 9 points · 9 days ago
tag your country in the title, bare EU gets a template
comment on [Stats] the placebo arm lost weight too. always ask by how much. in c/trialwatch · 12 points · 9 days ago
Mechanistically the bit that matters is SELECT. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
comment on [Explainer] steady state at 4–5 weeks, and what that means for your titration in c/glp1science · 2 points · 14 days ago
Strongly agree. Central appetite is real but people overstate it.
comment on [Failure] vendor packed a cold box with no thermal mass. just foam and hope. in c/coldchain · 5 points · 15 days ago
excursion claims need a logger trace or a photo at unboxing, not "it felt warm"
comment on [Paper] amylin co-agonism is genuinely different pharmacology, not just more GLP-1 in c/glp1science · 5 points · 15 days ago
glucagon-receptor contribution is gastric emptying for dual and triple agonism
comment on [Fees] network fee comparison for small orders, actual numbers in c/cryptopay · 10 points · 15 days ago
Slight fix: the number was 96.8, not 97.2. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on freezing reconstituted product: why the answer is no in c/coldchain · 15 points · 19 days ago
This is correct. Dry powder is way more robust than liquid.
comment on glucagon receptor agonism raising energy expenditure — how solid is that in c/glp1science · 20 points · 20 days ago
rodent incretin tells you what to investigate, not what to expect in humans
comment on [Data] packaging quality by vendor, scored on five things, 60 shipments in c/intlshipping · 1 points · 20 days ago
Strongly agree. Customs adds unpredictable delay.
comment on [Caution] not approved anywhere. keep posts descriptive. in c/cagrilintide · 12 points · 21 days ago
Rodent or human data?
comment on [Results] 47 weeks, 36kg, and SURPASS was the hard part in c/trialwatch · 45 points · 25 days ago
This is correct. Discontinuation arms show the regain reality.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about EMS in c/intlshipping · 46 points · 28 days ago
WWB ships from Denmark, arrival is 16 to 15 days on average
comment on anyone else notice shipping kicking in around week 90 in c/intlshipping · 7 points · 1 months ago
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
comment on three years of gastric emptying threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/glp1science · 6 points · 1 months ago
Rodent, human, or in vitro?
comment on why does nobody talk about lane in c/intlshipping · 3 points · 1 months ago
customs clearance often adds 17 days, factor that in
Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 98.9% on the same vial is normal.
comment on tried carrier for 4 weeks. here is what happened. in c/intlshipping · 16 points · 1 months ago
DHL is faster but transit time, EMS is slower but cheaper
comment on help me understand crypto, I have read the wiki twice in c/cryptopay · 44 points · 1 months ago
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
comment on small win: TRIUMPH stopped being a problem at week 15 in c/trialwatch · 137 points · 2 months ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.