[Stats] the placebo arm lost weight too. always ask by how much.
Right, the SURMOUNT question again, but with numbers this time.
I have 4 data points over 24 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.
The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 2, not week 51. People give up long before the interesting part.
Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
Mechanistically the bit that matters is SELECT. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
Is that absolute or relative risk reduction?
the discontinuation arms are the interesting part, not the SURPASS endpoints
absolute risk reduction, not relative risk reduction, that is how you decide
Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.
Yeah, absolute numbers matter more than the press release.
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
phase 2 is not phase 3, smaller n and shorter trial
- 1Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different…5 comments in this branch · started by u/camila_vasquez
- 2Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone…4 comments in this branch · started by u/valeria_karlsen