GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
2.5k
c/trialwatch·posted 2 months ago by u/yara_bakken

small win: TRIUMPH stopped being a problem at week 15

Trial Data Cold Box ×8 Slow Clap ×1

Something I noticed reading old threads that I have not seen said out loud.

The advice on SURMOUNT in this community changed substantially around the start of last year, and nobody went back and updated the older posts. So depending on which thread the search engine hands you, you get two contradictory answers with the same confidence.

I have listed what I think the current consensus is below. Correct me — that is the point of posting it.

2,582 up / 82 down97% upvoted42 commentsid 13xwha30 May 2026

42 comments

28 in this archive, depth 4

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/milos_vanhecke251 points·1 months ago

Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/hamza_weiss167 points·1 months ago

Yeah, absolute numbers matter more than the press release.

replysharereportpermalink
u/yara_bakkenOP95 points·1 months ago

Small correction: the trial was 18 weeks, not 14. Does not change your point but people will quote it.

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]70 points·1 months ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/yara_bakkenOP35 points·1 months ago

Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.

replysharereportpermalink
u/hugo_norgaard195 points·1 months ago

give the trial name, phase, n, and primary endpoint in the body

replysharereportpermalink
u/anders_kuusela129 points·1 months ago

absolute risk reduction, not relative risk reduction, that is how you decide

replysharereportpermalink
u/tb500_tangent28 points·1 months ago

Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.

replysharereportpermalink
u/milan_mensah137 points·2 months ago

No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.

replysharereportpermalink
u/enzo_ferrari107 points·1 months ago·edited

the relative risk reduction in headlines is not the whole story

replysharereportpermalink
u/alcohol_aversion53 points·1 months ago

I am going to push back on this slightly.

replysharereportpermalink
u/marit_laurent110 points·2 months ago

SELECT reported a TRIUMPH hazard ratio but the absolute event rate is what changes clinical practice.

replysharereportpermalink
u/week_one_wanda39 points·2 months ago

What was the dropout rate?

replysharereportpermalink
u/hugo_norgaard-21 points·1 months ago

press release hazard ratio posts must be flaired until a publication exists

replysharereportpermalink
u/alcohol_aversion1 point·1 months ago

Which trial and what was the primary endpoint?

replysharereportpermalink
u/ms_fragmenter1 point·1 months ago

give the trial name, phase, n, and primary endpoint in the body

replysharereportpermalink
u/rania_salinas42 points·2 months ago

event rates are more informative than hazard ratios alone

replysharereportpermalink
u/marit_laurent20 points·1 months ago

event rates are more informative than hazard ratios alone

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ines_boateng6 points·1 months ago·edited

give the trial name, phase, n, and primary endpoint in the body

replysharereportpermalink
u/niels_norgaard5 points·1 months ago

STEP, SURMOUNT, SURPASS, SELECT, FLOW, TRIUMPH — read the appendix

replysharereportpermalink
u/hub_opssite staff4 points·1 months ago

STEP, SURMOUNT, SURPASS, SELECT, FLOW, TRIUMPH — read the appendix

Adding to this: SURMOUNT is doing more work than the comment implies.

replysharereportpermalink
u/forest_plot_fionaMOD32 points·1 months ago

Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.

replysharereportpermalink
u/cloudy_vial_carol19 points·1 months ago

event rates are more informative than hazard ratios alone

replysharereportpermalink
u/draw_up_dizzy5 points·1 months ago

dropout handling matters, especially on GI-heavy populations

replysharereportpermalink
u/tb500_tangent3 points·1 months ago

the relative risk reduction in headlines is not the whole story

replysharereportpermalink
u/trialwatch_theotrial nerd6 points·1 months ago·edited

give the trial name, phase, n, and primary endpoint in the body

replysharereportpermalink
u/laila_almeida47 points·1 months ago

I am going to push back on this slightly.

replysharereportpermalink
u/hazard_ratio_halstats28 points·1 months ago·edited

press release SELECT posts must be flaired until a publication exists

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/trialwatch

Clinical trial reading group. New readouts, protocol amendments, endpoint definitions, dropout handling, and the difference between a press release and a publication. Absolute risk reduction and number-needed-to-treat are house dialect here.

34kmembers
95submissions
Nov 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/trialwatch rules
  1. Press-release-only posts must be flaired Press Release until a publication exists.
  2. Give the trial name, phase, n, and primary endpoint in the body.
  3. Relative risk reduction alone is not a result. Show the absolute numbers.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.