1.7k
what would you tell week-1 you about batch
Right, the certificate of analysis question again, but with numbers this time. I have 4 data points over 16 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think…
u/anders_kuusela
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Split.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
14,450post karma
7,417comment karma
6submissions
81comments
comment on [Paper] SURMOUNT-4 withdrawal arm, read the appendix not the abstract in c/trialwatch · 5 points · 3 days ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on [Results] came off deliberately over four months, regained 4kg not 24 in c/tapering · 3 points · 5 days ago
Strongly agree. The regain is expected.
comment on [Failure] 61.2% purity on a vial i had already been using for six weeks in c/darkspot · 0 points · 5 days ago
no piling on, mistake posts are favours to the community
comment on [Press Release] new phase 3 numbers, no publication yet, calm down in c/trialwatch · 18 points · 8 days ago
This is correct. Discontinuation arms show the regain reality.
comment on [Discussion] we use "appetite suppression" to describe three different mechanisms in c/glp1science · 6 points · 9 days ago
the half-life is incretin, affects steady state timing
comment on acetate counterion is why your 10mg vial has 8.7mg of peptide in c/coa · 2 points · 14 days ago
axis labels included, always
comment on [Explainer] the four things a COA must have or it is decorative in c/coa · -37 points · 17 days ago
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
comment on [Results] 47 weeks, 36kg, and SURPASS was the hard part in c/trialwatch · 1 points · 25 days ago
off-label use data is different from approved-indication data
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 72 weeks to accept.
comment on genuine question about SURMOUNT that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/trialwatch · 8 points · 29 days ago
press release SURMOUNT posts must be flaired until a publication exists
comment on biased agonism: real, interesting, almost certainly irrelevant to your dose in c/glp1science · 35 points · 29 days ago
The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.
comment on interval stretching is the most under-discussed thing in c/t2dglp1 in c/tapering · 6 points · 1 months ago
Ireland here.
Disagree on that part. 96.8% and 96.2% on the same vial is normal.
comment on identity and quantity are two questions and most COAs answer one in c/coa · 31 points · 1 months ago
Small correction: the trial was 6 weeks, not 39. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about batch in c/coa · 6 points · 1 months ago
Four months on the site and I was confusing area% and mass% in every post I made. One explainer thread and it clicked.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about batch in c/coa · 0 points · 1 months ago
Slight fix: the number was 99.3, not 93.7. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on [Discussion] the SURPASS advice in here is 9 years out of date in c/trialwatch · 29 points · 1 months ago
Flair changed to match the content.
Disagree on that part. 97.9% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.
comment on small win: TRIUMPH stopped being a problem at week 15 in c/trialwatch · 129 points · 1 months ago
absolute risk reduction, not relative risk reduction, that is how you decide
comment on Germany: water content, and what it actually costs here in c/coa · 8 points · 2 months ago
the related substances line is where the story is
comment on my TSH moved and I cannot work out whether stopped is why in c/darkspot · 3 points · 2 months ago
What are you comparing it against though?
comment on what changed for me between week 30 and week 73 in c/coa · 40 points · 2 months ago
Batch number and date of analysis? Both are load-bearing.